This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Proposal
- To: tim at hollebeek dot com
- Subject: Re: Proposal
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:39:54 +0100
- cc: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>, Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, Frank Klemm <pfk at fuchs dot offl dot uni-jena dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
- Organization: ARM Ltd.
- Reply-To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
>
> > Anything more complex is probably not worth it.
>
> Long decimals benefit just as much as large integers
> do. "3.141_592_653_529" should be legal too.
As should (IMO) 0xffff_0000_ffff_ffffUL
Which means it has to be a little more general than "decimal digit"
R.