This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit

To: Marc Espie <espie at quatramaran dot ens dot fr>
Subject: Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:02:35 -0700
Cc: jakub at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010916091654.C1812@lucon.org> <Pine.BSO.4.33.0109161323280.14503-100000@oddbox.cn> <20010917000719.B25531@false.linpro.no> <20010916153857.H22750@cyberhqz.com> <20010916155003.B1446@lucon.org> <20010917035509.B24278@dea.linux-mips.net> <20010917154001.D30386@redhat.com> <20010917155325.A25017@lucon.org> <20010918010107.G2189@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <200109181332.f8IDWXK10307@quatramaran.ens.fr>

On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 03:32:33PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> The next step would be to try and reorder relocations so that the
> -fpic stuff is nearer the GOT. Then the -fPIC stuff can overflow
> without harming the -fpic part.
> 
> Of course, I haven't checked the gnu linker recently. Maybe it already
> implements that ?

Nope.


r~

References:
- Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit
  - From: Ralf Baechle
- Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit
  - From: Marc Espie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]