Re: [Patch] C++ inlining heuristics changed (3.0.1)

[Daniel Berlin <dan at cgsoftware dot com>]

Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> writes:

> On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> > Those results look even better: Executables are slightly smaller and run at
>> slightly higher speed than with the first patch and much better than plain
>> 3.0.1.
>
> Excellent!  I'll give it a spin now...
>
>> I'd like to have this patch included in 3.0.2. (Unless somebody can come
>> with an inliner for 3.0.2 that does not cut inlining at leaves but at the
>> trunk of the call tree.)
>
> I strongly second this, and I definitely would like to see this applied
> ASAP, regardless of *any* future plans.
>
> "Besser der Spatz in der Hand als die Taube auf dem Dach" -- your patch
> exists and works; it just doesn't make sense waiting for something which
> might arrive (or not).
>
>> The copyright for this little contribution is herewith assigned to the
>> FSF.
>
> I'm afraid this is not sufficient for us to accept and install this
> patch -- we need a real copyright assignment
> to the FSF.
I'm not sure in this case, it's less than 30 lines of code.
Isn't this small enough to not require assignment?

>
> Assuming (well, hoping) that this won't be your last patch I have
> attached the required form for assigning this and possible future
> patches to the FSF.  If you really just want to assign a single patch
> or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me (privately).
>
> Gerald
> -- 
> Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/
>

-- 
"I just got out of the hospital.  I was in a speed reading
accident.  I hit a book mark and flew across the room.
"-Steven Wright