This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: obstack master source?

To: pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com
Subject: Re: obstack master source?
From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 10:34:00 -0400
CC: neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010816223330.A12456@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20010817105956.A13656@disaster.jaj.com>


> When I was writing a prototype libiberty manual, I think I learned that
> glibc is the master source.  There are a few other pieces of libiberty taken
> from glibc; once a module/routine passes some kind of mimimum usefulness
> threshold, it gets copied to libiberty.  :-)

glibc was the master for a number of libiberty files.  Those that fell
out of sync now say something like "originally from glibc".  If anyone
wants to take the time to merge the latest of those files (massive
retesting required) and make glibc an active master for them again,
please feel free.

References:
- obstack master source?
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: obstack master source?
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]