This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: gcc 3.0.1 & C++ ABI issues

To: Jason Merrill <jason_merrill at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0.1 & C++ ABI issues
From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 12:26:44 +0100
CC: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Organization: Codesourcery LLC
References: <24860000.997133068@warlock.codesourcery.com> <m3vgk0bu42.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <3B6FBA9A.D0FFE81C@codesourcery.com> <m3zo9c9oh9.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <3B6FC8F6.4235D0F@codesourcery.com> <m3ofps9lfp.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com>

Jason Merrill wrote:
> 
> Looks good, though I'm a bit puzzled by the change to the comment
> mentioning TYPE_NONCOPIED_PARTS before the call to fixup_inline_methods; we
> no longer touch TYPE_NONCOPIED_PARTS, right?
The gcc core still looks at it - I will submit patches for 3.1
which kill it there, and then that comment goes away.

nathan
-- 
Dr Nathan Sidwell   ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::   CodeSourcery LLC
         'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org

References:
- Re: gcc 3.0.1 & C++ ABI issues
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: gcc 3.0.1 & C++ ABI issues
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: gcc 3.0.1 & C++ ABI issues
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: gcc 3.0.1 & C++ ABI issues
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: gcc 3.0.1 & C++ ABI issues
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: gcc 3.0.1 & C++ ABI issues
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]