This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc 3.0 cannot compile pooma
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 cannot compile pooma
- From: Jason Merrill <jason_merrill at redhat dot com>
- Date: 06 Jun 2001 15:16:58 +0100
- Cc: "Zack Weinberg" <zackw at Stanford dot EDU>, Jeffrey Oldham <oldham at codesourcery dot com>, Peter Schmid <schmid at snake dot iap dot physik dot tu-darmstadt dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com
- References: <20010605224519.A979@stanford.edu><flelsxhiiy.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
>>>>> "Gabriel" == Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com> writes:
> "Zack Weinberg" <zackw@Stanford.EDU> writes:
> | On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 07:12:12AM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> | > "Zack Weinberg" <zackw@stanford.edu> writes:
> | > |
> | > | This is exactly what #include_next is for.
> That is what we have been doing with the c_shadow headers but the
> result is non-functional.
How so? If #include_next isn't working for you, I think the answer is to
fix #include_next.
Jason