This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Kahan's Floating Point Test


Michael Price wrote:

> My questions is: Why isn't there a switch like
> -mieee754-compliant-code-no-matter-how-slow-it-is-on-this-buggy-x86-fpu

If you follow Brad Lucier's advice and start reading at:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-03/msg00382.html

and then completely exhaust the "Follow-ups" sequence, you'll arrive at
my

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-03/msg00481.html

[ Note: this takes about a dozen follow-ups ]

"You [i.e, Brad] reach the same conclusion I did in my mail on the
 19th of July 1999 to gcc@gcc.gnu.org with Subject: "ia32 and IEEE-754 
 conformance." (see: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/1999-07n/msg00696.html), 
 although I agree your 0 .. 2 items sum it up more clearly.

 The overall conclusion at that time was that this would be useful to
 add to GCC, but no-one was stepping forward to do the work.

 That still is the case."

Hope this helps,

-- 
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]