This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++

To: Daniel Berlin <dan at cgsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 20:55:02 -0700
Cc: Michael Matz <matz at kde dot org>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>,Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot COM>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0105300000360.21177-100000@platon> <87u223snhi.fsf@dynamic-addr-83-177.resnet.rochester.edu>

On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 08:13:13PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> You might want to takes a looksie at the BeOS config files for LD.
> 
> On BeOS, everything is linked -Bsymbolic, by default.
> 
> And it does C++ just fine, even across shared libraries.
> 

I am not very sure if C++ works ok without any restrictions on BeOS.
That was my impression last time when I worked on a BeOS related
bfd problem.

H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++
  - From: Michael Matz
- Re: [I don't think it's off-topic at all] Linking speed for C++
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]