This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: atoi vs strtol in rtl.c:read_rtx()

To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: atoi vs strtol in rtl.c:read_rtx()
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 16:09:32 -0700
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <200105242034.QAA28344@greed.delorie.com> <20010524152502.C7222@redhat.com> <200105242255.SAA29114@greed.delorie.com>

On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 06:55:06PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Would we have to create one that handled HOST_WIDE_INTS bigger than
> long?  Say, a strtoll, or strtoull?

Yes.  You can autoconf check for that, as it exists in glibc.
We provide a fallback version of atoq already; that can be
replaced.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: atoi vs strtol in rtl.c:read_rtx()
  - From: DJ Delorie

References:
- atoi vs strtol in rtl.c:read_rtx()
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: atoi vs strtol in rtl.c:read_rtx()
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: atoi vs strtol in rtl.c:read_rtx()
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]