Re: lbasname (branch)

[Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>]

DJ Delorie wrote:-

> > Would you support the lbasename changes going into the branch?
> 
> Did the workaround get checked into the branch?

Hmmm.  Workaround for what?  I've not applied anything to branch, so if
something was broken before it still is (I assume you're talking about
the compiler proper, not CPP).

> If so, then what benefit would it add?

I'd like to get my CPP file fixes into branch; unfortunately they use
lbasename ().  I could use something else, or a local copy, but I'd
rather not.  If lbasename () stays out, I might as well leave CPP alone
too.

> I think at this point, the less unnecessary change in the branch, the
> better.

It's not strictly necessary, but fixes roughly ten minor issues.

Neil.