This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: RFC: makefile cleanups wrt unified tree

To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: RFC: makefile cleanups wrt unified tree
From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras at softhome dot net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 14:25:35 +0200
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010309223953.A6395@lauras.lt> <orbsr2ryj1.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20010316195850.E2785@lauras.lt> <or7l1o2ptl.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

> On Mar 16, 2001, "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras@softhome.net> wrote:
> 
> > Of course you're right, so I'll remove default definitions for these
> > tools from top level
> 
> This would get them right for GCC, but might break all other tools in
> the unified tree that the top-level configure/Makefile support.

Exactly. I've pointed this out in my previous mail. They would need
to adopt the same new Autoconf macros.

Hm, I'm starting to support Zack's idea about branch for configury work.

Laurynas

References:
- RFC: makefile cleanups wrt unified tree
  - From: Laurynas Biveinis
- Re: RFC: makefile cleanups wrt unified tree
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: RFC: makefile cleanups wrt unified tree
  - From: Laurynas Biveinis
- Re: RFC: makefile cleanups wrt unified tree
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]