This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code
- To: dewar at gnat dot com
- Subject: Re: Small update to reversed_comparison_code
- From: Joern Rennecke <amylaar at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 22:21:55 +0000 (GMT)
- Cc: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu, mrs at windriver dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
> Yes, from the developer's point of view, the patch is "correct", but that
> is not interesting if it breaks something. A latent bug is not a defect
> in operational terms, only in maintenance terms.
A latent bug for testsuite-coverage is often also a user-visible bug for
some innocous user program.