This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: A completely different approach to EH runtime
On Feb 22, 2001, "H . J . Lu" <hjl@valinux.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:08:38AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Feb 21, 2001, "H . J . Lu" <hjl@valinux.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Are you prepared to deal with 2 shared libgcc visible to ld.so at
>> > the same time and one of which doesn't come from the system vendor?
>>
>> I don't know about you, but I am, for as long as libgcc's major
>> version number doesn't change.
> I have given at least one example to show it won't work.
If some program depends on a newer version of the library, it's up to
the user to ensure the newer libgcc is used. No big deal.
> Do you know as far as the dynamic linker is concerned, a new SONAME is
> a totally different shared library?
Yep. On GNU/Linux.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me