This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc

To: ebiederm at xmission dot com
Subject: Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc
From: Marc Espie <espie at quatramaran dot ens dot fr>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:28:46 +0100
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: Ecole Normale Superieure (quatramaran)
References: <01021523111501.01075@enzo.bigblue.local> <20010215154529.A1933@valinux.com> <20010216233935.C19905@redhat.com>

In article <m1pugf11ie.fsf@frodo.biederman.org> you write:
>
>> > 3. Install it undr /lib for Linux.
>> 
>> Yes, but not via gcc's "make install".
>
>Why isn't libgcc installed in /lib for everyone?
>Give me an example of a unix system where that isn't the right thing
>to do and I'll reconsider.

tetto% uname
OpenBSD
tetto% ls /lib
ls: /lib: No such file or directory

Any other question ?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Problematic linking between glibc and shared libgcc
  - From: Eric W. Biederman

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]