This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch


On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:03:12PM -0800, Torvalds; Linus wrote:
> 
> Both of these are easy to solve if you just bite the bullet and make
> glibc jump to the next major number together with gcc-3.0 and say that
> gcc exception handling doesn't work with glibc-6, and vice versa.
> 

Sorry, Linus, you missed the whole point. Please check out my replies
to Zack's new proposal.

> 
> (Personally, I think that glibc should be _forced_ to change it's
> version number every time it comes up with a new release, and only use
> the minor numbers for the _really_ small changes that do not change any
> behaviour or add any new functionality.  I'd rather have five copies of
> the libraries than have one library that doesn't really work with all
> binaries). 
> 

Well, most of ISVs won't like this.

-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@valinux.com)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]