This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: mknumeric_limits
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: mknumeric_limits
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:55:37 -0700
- cc: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdr at codesourcery dot com
- Reply-To: law at redhat dot com
In message <Pine.SOL.3.91.1010219120108.15655A@taarna.cygnus.com>you write:
>
>
> Sometimes we have to use g++ instead of gcc because of __cplusplus
> defines in headers. That's the case for the acinclude.m4 bits.
But I don't think that using gcc for just the link step would affect
that. And using gcc instead of g++ would allow most (all?) of the crud
in the switch statement I pointed out to go away.
> Jeff why don't you post your pending mods so that people can get an idea
> of what you are trying to do.
For PA64 we have to link in an extra library. Of course we don't need or
want to link in that library for PA32.
jeff