This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch
- To: dmj+ at andrew dot cmu dot edu
- Subject: Re: Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:35:24 -0800
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <20010219005113.A1741@drow.them.org>
>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
Daniel> Will this behave correctly if glibc explicitly does not
Daniel> link to libgcc_s? That seems like it would defeat the
Daniel> purpose of of having a shared libgcc fairly thoroughly.
Daniel> My goal is to get C programs, at least those which require
Daniel> no shared libraries beyong the standard C library, to run
Daniel> without shared libgcc being available; I consider this a
Daniel> robustness issue. It may not be feasible, though.
I'm not sure about glibc. I do know that the GCC driver will not
explicitly link in libgcc_s for a static link of a C program.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com