This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [new-regalloc] What is the status on current sources

To: Michael Matz <matzmich at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
Subject: Re: [new-regalloc] What is the status on current sources
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 13:28:18 -0800
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at redhat dot com>, Geert Bosch <bosch at gnat dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0102100159300.25161-100000@www.cgsoftware.com> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0102100917190.22748-100000@platon>

On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 09:31:14AM +0100, Michael Matz wrote:
> No no, I never said, it's slow.  It's faster than bitmaps in nearly every
> case we have in ra.c.  It's not faster than sbitmaps as they are used now
> in ra.c in any case besides clearing.

It is faster when sbitmaps start swapping.  Or possibly
even fall out of cache.


r~

References:
- Re: [new-regalloc] What is the status on current sources
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: [new-regalloc] What is the status on current sources
  - From: Michael Matz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]