This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: builtin_return_addr vs frame_pointer_needed vs -O3


> +   /* In override_options, TARGET_OMIT_LEAF_FRAME_POINTER turns off
> +      the frame pointer by default.  Turn it back on now if we've not
> +      got a leaf function.  */
> +   if (TARGET_OMIT_LEAF_FRAME_POINTER && ! leaf_function_p ())
> +     return 1;

Could you explain this one?  I don't see how the non-leaf functions
require a frame pointer only when you want leaf functions to not have
one, but they don't require one otherwise.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]