This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.0 Branch Status
- To: rearnsha at arm dot com
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.0 Branch Status
- From: "Rod m. Stewart" <rod dot stewart at rebel dot com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 15:04:39 -0500
- CC: Philip Blundell <philb at gnu dot org>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, stewart at netwinder dot org, Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
- References: <200101221543.PAA05796@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > > I bootstrapped Friday's sources on my Netwinder without a problem; both
> > > with and without checking enabled.
> > >
> > > What I'm most concerned about is that the autobuild at NetWinder.org is
> > > still failing -- it seems to be showing all the hallmarks of using the
> > > pre-fixed copy of reload1.c. Rod, can you check that it really is
> > > building from the latest sources?
> > No, it has the latest reload1.c from CVS. It seems to be dying with the
> > following error (and looking back, has for a little while). About the
> > only major difference I have is I was building with --enable-debug.
> > I'll start a build now without that and see how it goes (although it
> > will take about 10 hours to complete).
> > (My machine crashed over the weekend, so I'm just starting today's build
> > now.)
> > Here is the error I've been getting:
> Yes, I can see the error from the build logs. Since I can't reproduce
> this on my own machine, I'm going to need more information. If it fails
> again, can you get me a stack back-trace from gdb?
My bootstrap has passed the previous failure without any problem now
(with and without the option: --enble-debug). So it looks as if the
problem is no longer there. I'll send a message after both builds
finish, but there should be no real problem.