This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC build failed with your patch on 2001-01-09T11:35:00Z.
- To: aoliva at redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: GCC build failed with your patch on 2001-01-09T11:35:00Z.
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:53:55 -0800
- Cc: law at redhat dot com, dje at watson dot ibm dot com, geoffk at redhat dot com, rth at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, grahams at redhat dot com, jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk, mhayes at redhat dot com, neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk, osk at hem dot passagen dot se
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <11544.979076855@upchuck><firstname.lastname@example.org>
>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <email@example.com> writes:
Alexandre> Since it seems that, of all 64-bit ports, the ppc is
Alexandre> the only one that fails with a 64-bit HOST_WIDE_INT,
Alexandre> how about a new target macro that would allow it to
Alexandre> force hwint.h to not use long long, while we work on
Alexandre> fixing the problems in the PPC port that prevent it
Alexandre> from working?
This is an approach we take far too often, IMO. We end up with more
configury bits than you can shake a stick at, all poorly documented,
and everything gets over-tangled.
Let's just fix the PPC problems. There's nothing I know of that makes
the changes to hwint.h super-urgent *right now*.
Mark Mitchell firstname.lastname@example.org
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com