This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: -std's (was Re: v3 link failures analyzed)

To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
Subject: Re: -std's (was Re: v3 link failures analyzed)
From: Jamie Lokier <egcs at tantalophile dot demon dot co dot uk>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:06:20 +0100
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <flitnnk42k.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101101207350.21823-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>

Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > Thanks.  Now I understand the motivation.  But I still think that
> > there should be an alias for the most recent standard in effect
> > (and understood by the compiler).
> 
> Under what circumstances would such an option be useful?

When you want to code to the most recent standard (whatever it is), and
have GCC enforce that with warnings etc.

-- Jamie

References:
- Re: -std's (was Re: v3 link failures analyzed)
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: -std's (was Re: v3 link failures analyzed)
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]