This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC build failed with your patch on 2001-01-09T11:35:00Z.
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: GCC build failed with your patch on 2001-01-09T11:35:00Z.
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 12:07:14 -0800
- Cc: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, Geoff Keating <geoffk at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, grahams at redhat dot com, jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk, mhayes at redhat dot com, neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk, osk at hem dot passagen dot se
- References: <200101091912.OAA38818@mal-ach.watson.ibm.com> <or1yuch6oy.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 05:22:05PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> And what is the correct definition maximum, natural host wide int?
Don't be obtuse. You know very well what he means.
Yes, the rs6000 port should be fixed to work with a 64-bit host word.
This is not entirely altruistic, since at present I can't cross from
my alphas. ;-)
But it is also not acceptable to slow down a native 32-bit ppc-linux
compiler by forcing it to do multi-word arithmetic when it is not
necessary.
r~