- To: Mark Mitchell <mitchell at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Returned message: Re: Branching for GCC 3.0
- From: Imput-Error-Report at gandalf dot codesourcery dot com
- Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 11:56:54 -0800
Your message was not delivered successfully.
Reason:
imput: can't open mail-aliases file: /nfs/gandalf/u2/mitchell/.im/Aliases, ignored.
imput: can't open host-aliases file: /nfs/gandalf/u2/mitchell/.hostaliases, ignored.
imput: message accepted.
imput: opening nntp session to localhost(119).
imput: nntp server localhost(119) did not respond.
imput: can't open history file: /nfs/gandalf/u2/mitchell/.im/putlog (No such file or directory)
imput: WARNING: nntp connection was not established.
imput: Connection refused
imput: can't open history file: /nfs/gandalf/u2/mitchell/.im/putlog (No such file or directory)
imput: ERROR: delivery failed.
imput: opening smtp session to localhost(25).
imput: >>> 220 gandalf.codesourcery.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.9.3/8.9.3; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 11:56:54 -0800
imput: <<< EHLO localhost
imput: >>> 250-gandalf.codesourcery.com Hello IDENT:mitchell@localhost [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you
imput: >>> 250-EXPN
imput: >>> 250-VERB
imput: >>> 250-8BITMIME
imput: >>> 250-SIZE
imput: >>> 250-DSN
imput: >>> 250-ONEX
imput: >>> 250-ETRN
imput: >>> 250-XUSR
imput: >>> 250 HELP
imput: <<< MAIL FROM:<>
imput: >>> 250 <>... Sender ok
imput: <<< RCPT TO:<mitchell@codesourcery.com>
imput: >>> 250 <mitchell@codesourcery.com>... Recipient ok
imput: <<< DATA
imput: >>> 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself
Reporting-MTA: dns; gandalf.codesourcery.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822; <jlarmour@redhat.com>
Action: failure
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: localhost
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;
Final-Recipient: rfc822; <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Action: failure
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: localhost
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;
>>>>> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour@redhat.com> writes:
Jonathan> In article <20010107125803Q.mitchell@codesourcery.com>
Jonathan> you write:
>> Richard's patch to support -shared-libgcc was the last
>> functional item on my list of things to do before GCC 3.0.
Jonathan> If gcc is branched now, does this mean that the libgcc
Jonathan> ABI is now set in stone?
We aren't branched yet -- and we can certainly do these things on the
branch if they make sense. But, yes, you should do them soon!
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com