This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: forget *documenting* libiberty -- how about *installing* it?
- To: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Subject: Re: forget *documenting* libiberty -- how about *installing* it?
- From: Michael Still <mikal at stillhq dot com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 11:25:36 +1100 (EST)
- Cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- ReSent-Subject: Re: forget *documenting* libiberty -- how about *installing*it?
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Phil Edwards wrote:
> We can't really expect people to make use of these utility subroutines if
> they're not easy to use. Not installing their headers, IMO, makes them
> not easy to use. :-)
Not that I'm a gcc developer, but I absolutely agree. I would be much more
likely to develop using libiberty if the headers were there. It also
reduces the changes of program breaking errors in my prototypes of the
functions within libiberty.
PS: Keep up the good work with gcc!
Michael Still (email@example.com)
- Panda PDF Generation Library (http://www.stillhq.com/cgi-bin/getpage?area=panda&page=index.htm)
- PandaLex PDF Parsing Library (http://www.stillhq.com/cgi-bin/getpage?area=pandalex&page=index.htm)
- PandaScript PDF Scripting Interface (http://www.stillhq.com/cgi-bin/getpage?area=pandascript&page=index.htm)
- GPG Public Key at http://www.stillhq.com/mikal.asc and on pgp.net keyservers
"To read makes our speaking english good" -- Xander, Buffy the Vampire Slayer in "I Robot, You Jane"