This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: libsupc++

To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: libsupc++
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien at FreeBSD dot org>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 16:09:37 -0800
Organization: The NUXI BSD group
References: <20001221155144.L10490@dragon.nuxi.com> <20001221190738.A25852@disaster.jaj.com>
Reply-To: obrien at FreeBSD dot org

On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 07:07:38PM -0500, Phil Edwards wrote:
>     1)  Programs which don't use the standard library shouldn't necessarily
>     be forced to link against libstdc++.  If it's a static link, the binary
>     is *huge*.  libsupc++ supports the core language itself and is small.

Static linking does not bring in a whole library, only those .o's inside
it that resolve symbol references.

Thanks for the explanation.
-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libsupc++
  - From: Phil Edwards

References:
- libsupc++
  - From: David O'Brien
- Re: libsupc++
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]