This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Stepanov results with development gcc
- To: Brad Lucier <lucier at math dot purdue dot edu>
- Subject: Re: Stepanov results with development gcc
- From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 14:42:00 -0500
- cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Something seems strange with these results. 2.95.1 was perfect?
2.95.2 was perfect?
My results for abstraction penalty using gcc -O2 on AIX are:
gcc-2.95.2 = 1.23-1.24
gcc-2.95.3 = 1.22-1.29
I do not have a current development gcc to test.
David