This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Licence terms of libstdc++-v3/porting.texi
- To: dewar at gnat dot com
- Subject: Re: Licence terms of libstdc++-v3/porting.texi
- From: Richard Stallman <rms at gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 09:07:05 -0700 (MST)
- CC: jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk, mark at codesourcery dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20001129185552.E115434D80@nile.gnat.com>
- Reply-to: rms at gnu dot org
I wonder sometimes about the exact legal status of licensing. Just putting
text into a file does not create a licensing or copyright statement of
legal fact.
It does, if the person making the statement is legally authorized to
decide the policy.
But it is unclear to me where the definitive licensing and copyright
statements can be found. For GNAT Professional (as licensed directly
to our paying customers, we provide a formal statement of licensing
conditions, stating that the GPL applies etc etc) But it is not clear
to me there is any such statement that applies to the entire GNU
project.
We put a statement of the license into each program because the
licenses are not all the same. I don't think that a single global
statement would be more authoritative, or more useful. And worst of
all, it could get out of sync with the packages themselves.