This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GNU Fortran90?
- To: Andrew Vaught <andy at xena dot eas dot asu dot edu>
- Subject: Re: GNU Fortran90?
- From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 13:03:16 +0100
- CC: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
- References: <Pine.LNX.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Andrew Vaught wrote:
> I wrote:
> >Note that Andy Vaught decided months ago to decompose all array
> >arithmetic into its consituent loops in g95 because that makes code
> >generation much easier.
> This isn't quite correct. Vector expressions are stored as such in
> g95's intermediate structures. If there is a mechanism in the GBE for
> implementing a vector expression then we can use it. If not, we have to
> generate the tree structures with loops that are equivalent to the vector
> expression. Another possibility is generating tree structures that take
> advantage of multiple processors via a standard thread interface.
Ugh, sorry for spreading this misinformation - apparently I
misunderstood what you wrote several months ago.
DO I = 1, 100
WRITE(6,*)'I should look into g95 internals more often.'
Toon Moene - mailto:email@example.com - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)