This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: cpplib: fix -Wtrigraphs double warnings
- To: zackw at Stanford dot EDU
- Subject: Re: cpplib: fix -Wtrigraphs double warnings
- From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 15:21:03 -0800
- CC: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20001122201542.A32422@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20001122202228.B32422@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20001122145740.I820@wolery.stanford.edu> <email@example.com> <20001123090348.Q820@wolery.stanford.edu>
- Reply-to: Geoff Keating <geoffk at redhat dot com>
> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 09:03:48 -0800
> From: "Zack Weinberg" <zackw@Stanford.EDU>
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 08:47:47AM -0800, Geoff Keating wrote:
> > "Zack Weinberg" <zackw@Stanford.EDU> writes:
> > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 08:22:28PM +0000, Neil Booth wrote:
> > > > And a testcase (Wtrigraphs.c):-
> > >
> > > I'm not sure this will fail in the presence of the bug. The existing
> > > trigraphs test should've picked it up, but it didn't.
> > >
> > > I don't know what to do about it, though; it's a design problem with
> > > dg.exp. The "excess errors" test doesn't distinguish between one copy
> > > of an error mesage, and multiple copies.
> > Are you sure you have the latest dejagnu?
> > I'm sure I've seen test failures in the regression tester caused
> > by this.
> I have the 20000714 snapshot. Should I be using something newer?
I'm not sure. The regression tester's currently using a version from
CVS on 20001116.
- Geoffrey Keating <email@example.com>