This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
- To: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
- From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at ACT-Europe dot FR>
- Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 17:32:33 +0100
- Cc: rms at gnu dot org, dstarner98 at aasaa dot ofe dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,guerby at acm dot org, kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu, law at redhat dot com
- References: <20001105162359.C7C8F34D82@nile.gnat.com>
> But anyway, there are no issues I know of that are significant.
Indeed. Actually at this stage the RPMs of GNAT constitute a subset of
what ACT builds and distributes since they have disabled some options like
the alternate run time library.
The package that we generate, whether they are tarballs or RPMs or
.deb will all have the same exact capabilities (including the two run time
as long as we decide to keep both).
Arno