This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Testsuite ad RedHat 7
- To: Marc Espie <espie at quatramaran dot ens dot fr>
- Subject: Re: Testsuite ad RedHat 7
- From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:05:15 +0200
- CC: jfm2 at club-internet dot fr, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
- References: <200010101603.SAA04655@quatramaran.ens.fr>
Marc Espie wrote:
> I respect the recent gcc cleanup (more releases, better managed development,
> good focus on 3.0 issues), I would just ask for slightly more Public Relation
> where 2.95 vs. 2.96 vs. 3.0 is concerned. In my mind, gcc has the possibility
> to set a much better standard of robustness and shipping schedule than
> your average GNU tool.
The first thing that *should* be done (and should have been done months
ago, IMNSHO) is to link the GCC 3.0 release criteria page from GCC's
home page. That would have foregone a lot of rather pointless debate
(i.e. like on Slashdot) about the "long overdue 3.0 release".
But I'm guilty here too, because I could have said this earlier ...
--
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)