This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Testsuite ad RedHat 7
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: Testsuite ad RedHat 7
- From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at mediaone dot net>
- Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 20:57:25 -0400
- References: <20001010005052.3DBDCF428@agnes.fremen.dune>
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 02:50:52AM +0200, jfm2@club-internet.fr wrote:
>
>
> Has anyone run a testsuite on the compiler in RedHat 7 and compared
> with a run using gcc-2.95. This could settle the question of what
> compiler is the less buggier once and for all. It is not that
> difficult to make gcc 2.95.2 core dump if you are agressive with
> optimization flags so it cannot deemed perfect.
gcc 2.96 cannot compile kernel 2.2.x. To some people, that qualifies
the compiler as buggy. To others, that qualifies the kernel as buggy. :)
For testing the C++ compiler, how about trying to compile Blitz++, which
is a heavy-duty C++ matrix class library which makes heavy use of templates:
http://www.oonumerics.org/blitz/
I routinely compile ACE, which is a C++ networking library:
http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-obtain.html
I had some problems with certain earlier versions of 2.96 in June/July, but
2.96 is such a moving target that I can't say for sure what didn't work.
Things seem pretty stable with the October snapshots of 2.97 from Codesourcery.
--
Craig Rodrigues
http://www.gis.net/~craigr
rodrigc@mediaone.net