This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Anyone knows about a testcase which was fixed by Wed Dec 24 18:05:13 1997 SPARC change?

To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: Anyone knows about a testcase which was fixed by Wed Dec 24 18:05:13 1997 SPARC change?
From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 01:07:26 -0700
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20001005171219.Y30053@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <200010052217.PAA03610@pizda.ninka.net> <20001006020617.B30053@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20001005235306.A6902@cygnus.com> <20001006040302.E30053@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 04:03:02AM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> ... so all functions which it might get through should be within one
> translation unit ...

But that patch was written before builtin_setjmp_receiver was
created.  It seems likely that nonlocal_goto_receiver should
be renamed, and triggered only for -mflat -fpic.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Anyone knows about a testcase which was fixed by Wed Dec 24 18:05:13 1997 SPARC change?
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- Anyone knows about a testcase which was fixed by Wed Dec 24 18:05:13 1997 SPARC change?
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Anyone knows about a testcase which was fixed by Wed Dec 24 18:05:13 1997 SPARC change?
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Anyone knows about a testcase which was fixed by Wed Dec 24 18:05:13 1997 SPARC change?
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]