This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: machine independent protection from stack-smashing attack


Would this be as an option or for all compiled code?

I would greatly prefer it to be --use_stack_smash (or whatever)
This way for people who do not need it for their application, it can be 
left out.

Thanks,

Matt Minnis

  At 12:01 AM 8/9/2000 +0900, Hiroaki Etoh wrote:


>I have been investigating a machine-independent change to GCC that
>would generate code to protect applications from stack-smashing attacks.
>The main characteristics are low performance overhead of the protection
>code, protecting against different varieties of stack-smashing attacks,
>and supporting various processors. A research report is ready on
>the web (http://www.trl.ibm.co.jp/projects/security/propolice).
>
>I would like some feedback whether it is worth pursuing getting it
>assigned to the FSF for inclusion in GCC.
>
>---
>Hiroaki Etoh,  Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM Japan

Cthulhu for President. Why settle for a lesser evil?

=========================================================
Preferred Resources          (314) 567-7600 phone
701 Emerson rd.              (314) 993-6699 fax
Suite 475		       mminnis@prefres.com
St. Louis, MO
63141
=========================================================


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]