This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: GCC's statement expression extension

To: meissner at cygnus dot com
Subject: Re: GCC's statement expression extension
From: Jim Wilson <wilson at cygnus dot com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 20:58:03 -0700
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <10007280242.AA18275@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <1123.964751982@upchuck> <20000727224506.40109@cse.cygnus.com> <20000727201604C.mitchell@codesourcery.com>

In article <20000727234956.65046@cse.cygnus.com> you write:
>> I disagree.  Compiling GCC 1.35 should not be a priority for current
>> versions of GCC.
>
>Well it is for Red Hat.  We have contracts that mandate building and running
>various releases of SPEC.  Whether or not approved modifications to the source
>are acceptable, I dunno, since I haven't been working on those contracts.

No, it isn't.  If the code in SPEC isn't valid ISO C, then we aren't
obligated to support it as is.

Jim

References:
- Re: GCC's statement expression extension
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: GCC's statement expression extension
  - From: Jeffrey A Law
- Re: GCC's statement expression extension
  - From: Michael Meissner
- Re: GCC's statement expression extension
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC's statement expression extension
  - From: Michael Meissner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]