This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Helping out GDB


>  From gcc-return-18993-jdein=wrs.com@gcc.gnu.org Fri Jul 14 16:05 PDT 2000
>  Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
>  List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gcc-unsubscribe-jdein=wrs.com@gcc.gnu.org>
>  List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
>  List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
>  List-Help: <http://egcs.cygnus.com/ml/>
>  Delivered-To: mailing list gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>  Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 01:04:23 +0200
>  From: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de>
>  To: jdein@windriver.com
>  CC: dberlin@redhat.com, dje@watson.ibm.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>  Subject: Re: Helping out GDB
>  User-Agent: SEMI/1.13.3 (Komaiko) FLIM/1.12.5 (Hirahata) Emacs/20.4 
(i586-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN)
>  MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.13.3 - "Komaiko")
>  
>  > VxWorks requires 'gcc2_compiled.'.  When gcc3_compiled. comes out,
>  > it will need that too.
>  
>  Could you please be a bit more specific what it needs that for? I
>  thought about proposing a patch to remove this feature entirely. If it
>  is to stay, I think its applications will need to be documented, so
>  future maintainers can re-validate the rationale for having it.

Oh, well.  Your request-for-info has led to a furious :-) disucussion here, and 
it appears that `gcc2_compiled.' will not be an issue after all.  Feel free to 
nuke it.  Sorry about the red herring.

Our downloading tools sometimes use gcc_compiled. to identify the code as being 
built with GNU (rather than a proprietary compiler).

Jim Dein

>  Regards,
>  Martin
>  

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]