This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: My proposal for the libgcc runtime ABI (ia64 gcc/glibc is broken.)
- To: drepper at cygnus dot com, martin at loewis dot home dot cs dot tu-berlin dot de
- Subject: Re: My proposal for the libgcc runtime ABI (ia64 gcc/glibc is broken.)
- From: Mike Stump <mrs at windriver dot com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 11:51:00 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, hjl at valinux dot com, kettenis at wins dot uva dot nl, law at cygnus dot com, libc-hacker at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, rth at twiddle dot net
> From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
> Date: 11 Jul 2000 00:51:24 -0700
> This is my I'm currently favouring a standaline package. But there
> might be situation where a new libc might require a new version of
> the libgcc.so
Isn't this as desirable as a new version of emacs requiring a new
version of libgcc.so?