This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH] Some inconsistency in collect2, with respect to gcc and libtool

To: aoliva at redhat dot com (Alexandre Oliva), gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Some inconsistency in collect2, with respect to gcc and libtool
From: Mark E. <snowball3 at bigfoot dot com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 13:25:41 -0400
Organization: Snowball's Web
References: <200007101827.UAA31352@quatramaran.ens.fr> <20000710171947.A15506@liafa1.liafa.jussieu.fr> <ord7kkbq3a.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

On 11 Jul 2000 18:17:00 +0200, you wrote:

>Unfortunately, even g++ won't work correctly on non-ELF systems.  I'm
>talking about implicit instantiation of template static data members,
>for example.  It is my understanding that this just can't be done
>correctly on COFF, for example :-(

As of Binutils 2.10, puny ole COFF has weak symbol support so template static data
members work just fine (when gcc is properly configured).

Mark
-- 
Mark E.: snowball3@bigfoot.com
http://snowball.frogspace.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Some inconsistency in collect2, with respect to gcc and libtool
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Some inconsistency in collect2, with respect to gcc and libtool
  - From: Marc Espie
- [PATCH] Some inconsistency in collect2, with respect to gcc and libtool
  - From: Marc Espie
- Re: [PATCH] Some inconsistency in collect2, with respect to gcc and libtool
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]