This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: long long, C++ testsuite and -ansi -pedantic-errors
- To: espie at quatramaran dot ens dot fr
- Subject: Re: long long, C++ testsuite and -ansi -pedantic-errors
- From: Mike Stump <mrs at windriver dot com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 20:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 04:00:54 +0200
> From: Marc Espie <espie@quatramaran.ens.fr>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 06:57:34PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> > > After all, he's part of the committee.
> > Ditto.
> > > I know that the C++ committee had some harsh words about C99, I
> > > don't quite remember the details, but C99 did break a few
> > > compatibilities routes for C++.
> > Was he in the room when we last talked about long long support in C++?
> > I was.
> It might be that you are on opposing branches off the committee. I
> don't think gcc/g++ should be a battling ground for the committee.
> If it's not part of the current standard, and if there is a
> controversy, even amongst the committee members, about whether it
> will be part of the next standard or not, then -ansi -pedantic
> should warn.
And if there is no controversy, or if the only controversy comes from
ignorance?