This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Conerned about lack of detail in ChangeLog/commit messges
- To: obrien at NUXI dot com
- Subject: Re: Conerned about lack of detail in ChangeLog/commit messges
- From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 11:30:21 -0400
- cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
>>>>> "David O'Brien" writes:
David> The ChangeLog entry for this change is:
David> revision 1.26
David> date: 1999/09/07 05:47:55; author: law; state: Exp; lines: +142 -130
David> Merge in gcc2-ss-010999
David> This lack of detail was very annoying as I spent a lot more time than
David> needed to verify that the differences I noticed in gen* were intentional.
David> The diff from 1.25 to 1.26 is large enough to explain the change.
David> Looking at ``cvs log gengenrtl.c'' I was unable to find any details on
David> the "gcc2-ss-010999" branch.
What you list above is the CVS entry, not the ChangeLog entry.
The entry in ChangeLog.2 says:
* Merge from gcc2 snapshot Jan 9, 1999. See FSFChangeLog for
details.
Did you check FSFChangeLog (which contains the ChangeLog entries from the
gcc2 development which was occurring in parallel with EGCS? The actual
various ChangeLog files are the historical repository, not CVS log
entries.
David