This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Check-In Requirements
* Mark Mitchell (mark@codesourcery.com) [20000602 17:15]:
> the effort. I think that if we are going to do this we should have a
> separate database for these test results.
I'll second that. It would only confuse people if we start mixing results.
And why post the results? The only use I see is to verify that somebody did
in fact run the checks and did indeed have no regression. But I just don't
think that this is really needed, or is it?
Philipp
--
Philipp Thomas <pthomas@suse.de>
Development, SuSE GmbH, Schanzaecker Str. 10, D-90443 Nuremberg, Germany
#define NINODE 50 /* number of in core inodes */
#define NPROC 30 /* max number of processes */
-- Version 7 UNIX fuer PDP 11, /usr/include/sys/param.h