This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: How "broken" is C complex number support?
- To: stevenj at alum dot mit dot edu
- Subject: Re: How "broken" is C complex number support?
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: 20 May 2000 22:33:51 +0200
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10005201616480.5886-100000@gil-galad.mit.edu>
- Reply-To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
"Steven G. Johnson" <stevenj@gil-galad.mit.edu> writes:
| Thanks! I currently don't have a 64-bit machine (assuming that's what you
| meant to write), so presumably that problem won't affect me and I don't
| need the CVS gcc. I am just using gcc 2.95.2 on x86 and PPC.
Aha, I (wrongly) assumed you were talking about CVS gcc. I don't have
any idea of how broken complex support is as far as gcc-2.95.x is
concerned.
-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com