This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Suggestions for ChangeLog: cut it, and start config/ChangeLog
- To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- Subject: Re: Suggestions for ChangeLog: cut it, and start config/ChangeLog
- From: Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 18:41:34 -0800
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: Core Tools, Apple Computer
- References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10003152053340.11806-100000@dair.pair.com>
- Reply-To: shebs at apple dot com
Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>
> Subject says it most.
>
> The gcc/ChangeLog is now larger than any previous one, adding to "cvs up"
> delay when local changes are made, for one reason.
> Perhaps cutting a ChangeLog.2 at Jan 1 would be good; it would slice off
> 5/7 roughly.
GDB has been cutting ChangeLogs at year boundaries for quite a while, and
that seems to work well. If you know the year of a change, you can go straight
to the right file. Also, ChangeLogs at the beginning of a year are especially
quick to update!
> I'd also like to propose having a config/ChangeLog, for port changes and
> other config/* changes.
> Maybe that has been discussed and rejected at some time, though I don't
> remember it and no valid hits turned up when searching for "ChangeLog and
> config".
That doesn't seem like such a good idea; very often changes in generic code
are associated with changes to config/ code, so if you're researching history,
you'll have to have both ChangeLogs up at the same time - which defeats the
purpose of making them separate.
Stan