This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: memory exhausted

To: "Knut-HÂvard Aksnes" <knut at orion dot no>
Subject: Re: memory exhausted
From: michael cardenas <michael_cardenas at deneba dot com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 11:32:03 -0500
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <l03130301b4d30ac090ce@[192.168.10.100]><l03130300b4d1f40d0f37@[192.168.10.100]><l03130301b4d30ac090ce@[192.168.10.100]>

Could that really make much of a speed difference? Or is that just to
prevent the memory exhausted error?

>michael cardenas writes:
> > My swap partition is 128mb. Because the machine originally had 128mb of
> > ram. I didn't think there was any way to resize the partition.
> >
>
>Use the swapon an dmkswap commands.
>Read the man pages for documentation.

References:
- Re: memory exhausted
  - From: michael cardenas
- memory exhausted
  - From: michael cardenas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]