This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: new port contributing (ATMEL AVR)
- To: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin at loewis dot home dot cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
- Subject: Re: new port contributing (ATMEL AVR)
- From: Denis Chertykov <denisc at overta dot ru>
- Date: 02 Feb 2000 21:42:13 +0300
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <200001252014.XAA11119@tigris.overta.ru> <200001252259.XAA00950@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de>
"Martin v. Loewis" <martin@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
> - make one patch for the config subdirectory. I guess this patch, on its
> own, won't produce any conflicts with existing files, and will consist
> of all-new files. Maybe a tar file would be even more appropriate,
> together with the ChangeLog entry.
Now this step done.
Must I wait a response from maintainers ? Or CVS will have my
subdirectory.
> - make a patch adding all the configuration infrastructure. I don't
> know how large that patch would be, but ideally, it would be only
> configure.in changes, plus the rebuild configure, plus the ChangeLog
> entry.
It will only configure.in changes.
What is `plus the rebuild configure' ?
Must I rebuild configure on my machine and send it ? Or one of the
maintainers must do this ?
Denis.