This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Estimated SPEC2000 results for gcc+alpha
- To: Brad Lucier <lucier at math dot purdue dot edu>
- Subject: Re: Estimated SPEC2000 results for gcc+alpha
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 12:06:19 -0800
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, hosking at cs dot purdue dot edu
- References: <200001271624.LAA21715@polya.math.purdue.edu>
On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 11:24:41AM -0500, Brad Lucier wrote:
> I do have some partial results, though. If people think that it will
> help the development of the gcc toolset, then I'll continue.
Fixing the bugs that were exposed would help everyone. Tuning
would of course also help, but it seems rare to find the time.
> 171.swim X
> 172.mgrid X
> 173.applu X
> 301.apsi X
Wow I'm surprised all of these failed. Or did they update them for f90?
> 176.gcc X
Is this a compilation failure? Spec95 shipped with code that simply
would not compile with gcc due to ifdef __GNUC__ code referring to
stuff they'd removed.
r~