This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: why no stacktrace?

To: Andi Kleen <ak at muc dot de>
Subject: Re: why no stacktrace?
From: "Matthias Urlichs" <smurf at noris dot net>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 17:49:20 +0100
Cc: Ulrich Lauther <ulrich dot lauther at mchp dot siemens dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <m3puvheve5.fsf@fred.muc.de> <200001041518.QAA16880@fubini.mchp.siemens.de> <20000104163835.A2795@fred.muc.de>

Hi,

Andi Kleen:
> and it can be tricky to find the exact path of the location (you need argv[0]
> and the PATH environment variable and a search function).
>
We were talking about Linux => your executable is in /proc/self/exe.

-- 
Matthias Urlichs  |  noris network GmbH   |   smurf@noris.de  |  ICQ: 20193661
The quote was selected randomly. Really.    |      http://www.noris.de/~smurf/
-- 
Q:        Why do mountain climbers rope themselves together?
A:        To prevent the sensible ones from going home.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: why no stacktrace?
  - From: Ulrich Lauther
- Re: why no stacktrace?
  - From: Andi Kleen

References:
- Re: why no stacktrace?
  - From: Andi Kleen
- Re: why no stacktrace?
  - From: Ulrich Lauther
- Re: why no stacktrace?
  - From: Andi Kleen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]