This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Inlining on trees
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: Inlining on trees
- From: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at cygnus dot co dot uk>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 10:04:54 +0000 (GMT)
- cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, "Jeffrey A. Law" <law at cygnus dot com>, Jim Wilson <wilson at cygnus dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
> I would like to see such tree-based inlining completely replace
> the current integrate.c. I would like to not see us hang on to
> the old integrator indefinitely, nuking it sooner rather than later.
This reminds me of a similar question. What about GC support? It would
be nice to get all frontends converted to use GC; we could then remove
another large chunk of code from the compiler.
I'd start doing it, but I'm not too familiar with most of the frontends.
Worse, I've never ever seen a single piece of Chill sourcecode in my
life, so there's no way I could test any conversion of that frontend.
[Does anyone actually _use_ Chill, or is it just baggage we're carrying