This is the mail archive of the egcs@egcs.cygnus.com mailing list for the EGCS project. See the EGCS home page for more information.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
>>>>> Martin v Loewis <martin@mira.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de> writes: >> This is OK; so long as the data structures are similar enough the only >> harm would be having two copies of the code in the executable. > It depends on the application. Consider > extern void foo(vector<int>&); Ah, yes. >> But it is backward compatible. I don't mind requiring people to use >> the newest compiler to link mixed code. > Ok. So 1.2 is backwards-compatible in the sense that you can link 1.1 > libraries into 1.2 applications, right? (Unless they use STL). Right. Jason